Most people who know me recognize that I am kind of a nerd when it comes to marketing planning, budgeting, and operations stuff. I have been that way for most of my 30+ year career, and it has become a real obsession over the last decade or so. Since starting Planful in 2017, I have taken the obsession to a whole new level, with Planful’s marketing budget management software platform.
I recently spent some time reflecting on what I have learned during my quest to improve marketing planning. I thought it would be helpful to catalog the most common problems I have seen in marketing plans during my assessment. After reviewing well over 1,000 marketing plans, I can confidently say that these problems are pervasive and have a material impact on the effectiveness of your marketing investments.
Let’s start by agreeing that a marketing plan is a superset of a marketing budget. For a slightly deeper discussion on that topic, read my blog that describes the difference between a plan, budget, and a strategy. If you don’t have the time to read it, you will understand the key message by reading the cartoon below:
For the purpose of this article, we are going to focus primarily on budgeting tools since they are the cause of most of the issues. While most budgeting tools are built-in spreadsheets, they take on different forms:
There’s nothing like a pristine sheet of empty rows and columns to inspire dread at the beginning of your planning cycle. You start by deciding whether you want to budget by month or quarter. Do you add quarterly subtotals? How do you break down the budget into segments? Do you use campaigns, departments, expense types, GL Codes, or something completely different?
Starting with a blank sheet creates a lot of potential issues, including the high likelihood that you will forget something important, and the almost certainty that your data will have to be reformatted to roll up to the corporate plan.
You can tell that you have this kind of template when nobody in the company remembers where it came from. For all you know, it could have been written on VisiCalc or Lotus 1-2-3. It is distinguished by its inconsistent formatting and untraceable formulas. Because these tools are often modified as they are passed through an organization, they are riddled with errors and bloated with extra tabs and features that you don’t need.
Admit it. You’ve been here. Your budget was due the following day and you procrastinated so much that you had to find a template online to start from. The biggest problem with these templates is that they are either so generic that you will leave things out, or they are designed for a different type of business and won’t be relevant. In most cases, you don’t know the origin and may be faced with bad formulas or inconsistent logic.
We all have seen this template too. There is a super spreadsheet zealot who has developed the most complicated model known to man. It auto-categorizes expenditures, automates workflows with macros, and even creates fancy reports. The problem is that you need to be a PhD from MIT, or Dan Bricklin to figure it out (OK, that’s 2 Dan Bricklin references in a single blog post – probably a record.) These models typically have many individual worksheets and are far too intimidating for most budget managers. And because spreadsheets can be easily changed by users, the macros, formulas, and other automation is brittle and can easily break.
Of all the templates that we see, this is the most common one. The finance team often develops a template for marketing budget that is consistent with the templates for other functions. The problem is that marketers don’t budget the same way that Finance, HR, or IT people budget. We don’t think in GL codes and departments, we think in campaigns and goals.
The point of listing all the different (and flawed) tools used for planning and budgeting is to highlight the fact that it is difficult for anyone to build a successful plan with these primitive tools. I meet smart, experienced marketers every day who have great execution skills, and a deep understanding of marketing management, but they don’t have the right tools and systems to successfully navigate this complex process of managing a complete marketing plan and budget
With all of that context in mind, I’d like to introduce the most common errors that we see in marketing plans.
When we onboard customers at Planful, we see formula errors more than 80% of the time. The most common cause of formula errors is adding a row of data without updating the formula that sums up that row. You can learn more about diagnosing these errors by watching my video on this subject. We often see formulas broken when people pass along templates through the ages at a company.
Another common budgeting issue often appears in the “NASA template” that we describe above. As formulas grow in complexity, they become more brittle and error-prone – and they are difficult to debug when problems arise. These formulas also can assume a level of knowledge on the part of the user.
I was recently working with a customer who was quite sophisticated in his spreadsheet skills. His worksheet automatically added up certain expense types and categorized them into the finance template. The only problem is that the individual budget owners didn’t understand the logic, so the formulas did not count $180,000 of the budget that the individual managers were planning to spend. That error alone represented nearly 10% of his overall budget.
As spreadsheets get passed along, we often see users typing numbers over formulas in non-protected cells, destroying the logic in the worksheet. This can happen when a user pastes data into a worksheet from a different source. In many cases, you wouldn’t be able to tell that formula was replaced by a number unless you inspected every single cell of a worksheet.
During a recent onboarding, I couldn’t figure out why Planful was showing a different budget total than the customer’s worksheet. In the end, I had to inspect hundreds of individual cells to find that someone had pasted a number in a cell that was supposed to total a row. The end result was a $75,000 mistake in their budget.
Incorrect data can creep into a plan easily when combining data from multiple sources. In some cases, we see data being rekeyed from one source into another, and transposition errors can occur. In other cases, we see numbers copied and pasted from presentations or documents into spreadsheets, and they are entered as a text string instead of a number. When that happens, the spreadsheet doesn’t recognize the number and will under-represent the budget.
Even if you have an error-free budget, most marketers struggle with visibility into their actual spending vs. their plan. The problem is exacerbated when you distribute budget authority across an organization. Without an accurate view of the actual spending vs. plan, most marketers have to spend conservatively to make sure they don’t exceed their budget.
We have seen some pretty extreme cases of this budgeting issue with our customers (before they used Planful). For example, we have seen companies spend their entire budget in 9 months, not realizing that they would be deficit spending for the last quarter of the year. We have seen cases where a third of the annual budget is unspent in the last month of the year, resulting in underspending and non-strategic spending.
Related: Creating a Marketing Budget That Can Be Justified
These days, most people don’t balance their checkbooks because they track all their spending online via credit card transactions, ATM withdrawals, digital payments like Venmo, and maybe the occasional check.
When you are dealing with a marketing budget, a lack of alignment between marketing and finance can cause huge problems. Timing of the accounting of expenses can cause huge differences in your view of the actual expenditures vs. the finance view. And incorrect coding of expenses to the marketing department can cause further lack of alignment. You can quickly get out of alignment without reconciling your expenses with the finance view.
With marketing expense management, reconciling your expenses with finance is a good idea, but it can be a hugely complex administrative task. We recently worked with a customer who had a marketing operations staff member spending a full day a week reconciling expenses with finance. Not only is this budget issue a huge cost for a well-compensation professional, but it was an awful job that created turnover because nobody wanted to do it.
One of the biggest areas of waste in a budget is what we like to call a “trapped budget.” You trap budget in your plan when you estimate the cost of a campaign or expense conservatively and never recoup the difference. You also see departments underspend because they can’t forecast well, leaving budget on the table. We typically see more than 5% (and often more than 10%) of the budget lost to being trapped in your plan.
When I was working as a CMO in my last company, I used to walk around to marketing managers and ask them to show me their plans. Typically (as in the cartoon above), they would show me their budget worksheet. When they shared what they were working on, I would ask how their work was helping us achieve our objectives. More often than not, I would get a blank (or nervous) stare when I asked that question.
I would also see a lot of non-strategic spending when people tried to use their budget. If they had $50,000 planned for a campaign and only spent $45,000, what happened to that $5,000 (see the “trapped budget” above)? In many cases, the marketing manager would spend the remaining budget on something that was not directly related to driving the business – like getting more swag for the next trade show.
If you are trying to figure out how to spend that remaining budget before the end of the quarter, you will probably not get the best possible deal. And in some cases, if you don’t have good advance planning, you will have to pay rush charges to get the work done so it can be billed in the period when you have the remaining budget.
When you add up the economic impact of all these issues, you typically get a pretty big number. Rakuten Marketing did a survey of CMOs and they estimated that 26% of their budget was wasted due to poor planning. Our experience with hundreds of real-life budgets is consistent with that view.
For example, we have found spreadsheet errors that add up to an average of 8.2% of our customers’ budgets. We see another 10% of budget lost to poor forecasting, and anywhere between 5% and 24% of trapped budget in the plan. That already gets to the number reported by the Rakuten study without considering non-strategic spending or rush charges.
In other words, the current primitive tools of the trade create a huge amount of waste in marketing plans. Somebody ought to do something about that 😉
If you made it this far in the article, you are either a real budget nerd like me, or you have a huge problem. Either way, we’d love to show you a demo of Planful’s marketing planning software to help you address these budgeting issues. Sign up for a demo today.
Interviews, tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.